Tommy Wonder on the Zombie Ball and the Quality of Magic
Hey everyone,
I saw this text published by Pasto Magic and I couldn't resist sharing it.
What do you all think?
5
3
Hey everyone,
I saw this text published by Pasto Magic and I couldn't resist sharing it.
What do you all think?
3
Join the conversation
Sort:
I once read,
“It’s been said that the hand is quicker than the eye; however, the eye is 10 times faster than the hand, and the mind is 100 times faster than the eye; that’s why magic effects must be designed to fool the mind.”
That's when I understood why great magicians don't focus on rapid movements; instead, their true skill shines through slow, precise actions that the spectator's eye can't quite catch, all wrapped up in generous and imaginative stories that flatter (and distract) the mind, building to the perfect climax.
Regards,
@link22:
He's absolutely right. 😊
Some effects don't actually require a ton of skill or dexterity; by their very nature, they're just that impressive.
And even so, depending on who's performing them, they can either gain or lose impact.
There are no bad tricks (not a single one), just poorly performed ones.
Honestly, the thing about "bad" effects is pretty fascinating.
Gea mentions a spelling routine in one of his latest books. He notes that it was a type of routine he wasn't particularly fond of, and he thought that with Malini-style repetition, it could be incredibly boring for the audience. He set out to create a fictional premise around the spelling and leverage that premise.
The result was a National Grand Prize in 2004, and that's no small feat!
So yeah, watch out for the routines we're not totally sold on (haha).
But what's clear is that you really have to nurture your routines and only present them when the time is right. There's no need to rush; quite the opposite, in fact.